Your channel viewers will see links here, including "subscribe" and "add as friend".
Profile
Name
Two23siX
Description
Music Producer
Subscribers
878
Subscriptions
Recent Activity
 |
Two23siX
We've been expecting you...
 |
|
|
Two23siX
 |
|
|
Two23siX
 |
|
|
Two23siX
This is for everyone questioning whether or not the book of Enoch was part of the Greek septuagint, the earliest known translation of the Hebrew/Aramaic scriptures translated just before the time of Christ, which is the Bible used and quoted by christ and every writer of the new testament basically, who quotes the old testament...
Septuagint scholars will tell you that any book formerly written in either Hebrew or Aramaic, then translated into Greek during the second temple (Herod's not Solomon's) time period, is counted as part of the effort of the septuagint.
Proof of this is the inclusion of the Greek portions of the book of Enoch that were found at the dead sea, which were included in the Lexham English Septuagint. It's not in the correct order, in my opinion, because it's the first book ever written and claims to be also, but at least it's proof that scholars recognize this fact.
Because scholars recognize it was very likely part of the septuagint, based on manuscript evidence
Notice also the odes of Solomon, the wisdom of Solomon, and numerous other "apocryphal" books.
They were not called apocrypha back then... Just scripture.
 |
|
Friends (2)
Channel Comments
|
anubiis4563
(1 year ago)
|
|
MotwkilMakki
(1 year ago)
|
|
YounnessJabari-bs3lm
(1 year ago)
|
|
SudipKhadka1717
(1 year ago)
|
|
apzpf
(1 year ago)
Gogo
|
|
ahmedkhadhor9277
(1 year ago)
دبييي
|
|
TEMOKING-uo2mh
(1 year ago)
هه
|
|
Sanjay2Crack
(1 year ago)
|
|
|
TEMOKING-uo2mh
(1 year ago)
|
|
AbodeAbbode
(1 year ago)
|
|
ابوجانس
(1 year ago)
|
|
m_48.7
(1 year ago)
|
Add comment